Why customers choose SAFE vs. KPMG
SAFE is the #1 choice for enterprises demanding autonomous cyber risk management — continuous, FAIRTM–compliant, and powered by Agentic AI.
TRUSTED BY INDUSTRY LEADERS
Why SAFE Wins Vs KPMG
VS
Product Offerings
SAFE is is the #1 platform for continuous cyber risk management while KPMG’s CRQ is delivered more as a service engagement rather than a fully autonomous platform.
Autonomous, Agentic AI
SAFE’s autonomous approach is powered by Agentic AI. KPMG provides intelligent automation but there is no mention of Agentic AI in its CRQ offering
Third-Party Risk
SAFE integrates TPRM directly into its CRQ platform with Cyber Risk Singularity. KPMG offers smart TPRM enhancements (KACEY™) as a standalone rather than a core component of CRQ.
SAFE vs KPMG Overview
SAFE is redefining cyber risk management with Agentic AI. We empower CISOs, cybersecurity, and TPRM leaders to continuously quantify, prioritize, and mitigate cyber risks across their entire attack surface - enabling digital growth and organizational resilience.
SAFE is the category leader in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) and the first company to deliver 100% autonomous Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) and Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM).
Trusted by industry leaders including Google, Fidelity, T-Mobile, Chevron, and IHG, SAFE has achieved triple-digit revenue growth for three consecutive years and raised over $170 million to date.
SAFE is the category leader in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) and the first company to deliver 100% autonomous Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) and Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM).
Trusted by industry leaders including Google, Fidelity, T-Mobile, Chevron, and IHG, SAFE has achieved triple-digit revenue growth for three consecutive years and raised over $170 million to date.
KPMG
KPMG stands out among the Big Four as the only firm with its own comprehensive CRQ platform. Cyber Risk Insights focuses on quick adoption via pre-modelled scenarios, making CRQ accessible for organizations beginning their CRQ programs.
However, there is limited evidence of autonomous or generative/agentic AI within their CRQ workflow. KPMG discusses AI broadly but does not present CRI itself as autonomous.
KPMG does not explicitly state alignment with open standards such as FAIRTM or MITRE. KPMG’s third-party risk capabilities are described under separate TPRM services rather than as integrated, continuous CRQ features.
However, there is limited evidence of autonomous or generative/agentic AI within their CRQ workflow. KPMG discusses AI broadly but does not present CRI itself as autonomous.
KPMG does not explicitly state alignment with open standards such as FAIRTM or MITRE. KPMG’s third-party risk capabilities are described under separate TPRM services rather than as integrated, continuous CRQ features.
Bottom Line
SAFE is the top choice for organizations seeking a continuous, AI-powered CRQ program with built-in third-party, insurance, and automation capabilities. KPMG is a strong option for firms needing scenario-based decision support, but lacks the automation needed for large-scale, continuous programs.