Why customers choose SAFE vs. ThreatConnect
SAFE is the #1 choice for enterprises demanding autonomous cyber risk management — continuous, FAIRTM–compliant, and powered by Agentic AI.
TRUSTED BY INDUSTRY LEADERS
Why SAFE Wins Vs ThreatConnect
VS
Product Strength and Offerings
SAFE is the #1 choice for continuous CRQ to truly redefine cyber risk management by integrating CRQ, TPRM, CTEM and cyber insurance. ThreatConnect’s focus is narrower.
Open Standards-Based
SAFE is purpose built on open standards including FAIR and MITRE. ThreatConnect’s maturity assessments lack open-standards defensibility.
Strategy and Vision
SAFE’s mission to build Cyber AGI sets a new paradigm for cyber risk management. ThreatConnect has not evolved into a unified cyber risk platform.
SAFE vs ThreatConnect Overview
SAFE is redefining cyber risk management with Agentic AI. We empower CISOs, cybersecurity, and TPRM leaders to continuously quantify, prioritize, and mitigate cyber risks across their entire attack surface - enabling digital growth and organizational resilience.
SAFE is the category leader in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) and the first company to deliver 100% autonomous Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) and Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM).
Trusted by industry leaders including Google, Fidelity, T-Mobile, Chevron, and IHG, SAFE has achieved triple-digit revenue growth for three consecutive years and raised over $170 million to date.
SAFE is the category leader in Cyber Risk Quantification (CRQ) and the first company to deliver 100% autonomous Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM) and Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM).
Trusted by industry leaders including Google, Fidelity, T-Mobile, Chevron, and IHG, SAFE has achieved triple-digit revenue growth for three consecutive years and raised over $170 million to date.
ThreatConnect
ThreatConnect initially gained traction as a threat intelligence platform (TIP) before expanding into SOAR and risk management capabilities. Its Risk Quantifier solution links threats, vulnerabilities, and incidents to business risk, but remains limited in depth compared to CRQ-native platforms.
ThreatConnect does not natively support third-party risk management or outside-in telemetry, requiring integrations to achieve visibility into supply chain exposure.
Moreover, its reliance on proprietary scoring methods, rather than open standards like FAIRTM or FAIR-CAMTM, positions it as less defensible in executive and regulatory conversations.
ThreatConnect does not natively support third-party risk management or outside-in telemetry, requiring integrations to achieve visibility into supply chain exposure.
Moreover, its reliance on proprietary scoring methods, rather than open standards like FAIRTM or FAIR-CAMTM, positions it as less defensible in executive and regulatory conversations.
Bottom Line
SAFE is the best choice for organizations seeking an autonomous, scalable, and open standards-based CRQ platform. ThreatConnect is a good fit for teams prioritizing threat-informed mitigation, but lacks SAFE’s autonomous approach, innovation, and roadmap.