Glovo Customer Spotlight

Positive Business Outcomes

Security investment justification:

• Glovo wanted to quantify top 3 risk scenarios and assess the impact of a Security Solution as a risk treatment option
• They have pushed internally for improved specific security controls in the past and have never been able to quantify the benefit of them
• SAFE One allows them to quantify the decrease in likelihood associated with maturing such controls as well as compare reduction in ALE (Annualized Loss Exposure) against the cost of the control to attempt to justify the spend internally

Preventing the removal of already established controls related to a secure coding training platform:

• Leadership was inquiring about the returned value related to a secure code training platform
• The team assessed the risk increase that Glovo could face as a result of removing such control
• They have engaged with Leadership to share the analysis and communicate the risk associated with making this change

Before Safe

• Used FAIR-U (a tool provided by the FAIR Institute for training and performing single FAIR-based risk analyses) to manually assess individual risk scenarios
• Relied on basic FAIR capabilities in FAIR-U without What-If Analysis

After Safe

• Quantitative, defensible assessment of risk scenarios to inform investment justification and budget planning using SAFE One
• Reliant on trusted models FAIR-CAM and FAIR-MAM and automation to scale the risk assessment process and perform What-If Risk Treatment Analysis across the Enterprise